In his celebrated article ‘Good and Evil,’ P. T. Geach argues that the adjectives good and evil or bad are ‘logically attributive,’ meaning (roughly) that in predications of the form ‘a is a good/bad B’ the sense of ‘good/bad’ depends upon what common noun or noun-phrase fills the role of B. For example, ‘good’ has different senses in ‘a is a good wicket,’ ‘a is a good argument’ and ‘a is a good typist,’ and these differences in sense arise from the differences between wickets, arguments, and typists.
Showing posts with label Good and Evil. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Good and Evil. Show all posts
14 May 2011
19 April 2011
The Good and the Bad
Good: We watched P. T. Anderson's Magnolia for film class tonight.
Bad: I have several papers and paper-revisions due the end of this week upon which I could not work during the three hours spent watching Magnolia.
Good: I just learned that I got a good grade on an old paper, which means one fewer paper to revise.
Bad: I also have a bunch of reading for tomorrow, meaning yet less time to write.
Good: Half of my reading is from Aristotle's De Anima.
Bad: I have to type up a focus statement on the De Anima, as well.
Good: My professor says I get to use St. Thomas' commentary in writing said focus statement.
All in all: things are good, if hectic.
Sorry for the dearth of posts of late: much to do for school recently. I'll be back to regular posts in a couple of weeks.
Labels:
Aquinas,
Aristotle,
Good and Evil,
Personal
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)